The named-user transition from network licences, the Premium plan uplift, the Flex token design, the AEC Collection and Product Design and Manufacturing Collection scope, the Maintenance and Support migration to subscription, and the transactional licence audit defence. Autodesk renewals close on a population-by-population reconciliation and a Premium tier contest, not on the publisher's listed uplift. Independent buyer-side advisory across the AutoCAD, Revit, Inventor, Fusion, Maya, 3ds Max and Construction Cloud estates.
Autodesk Premium plan pricing carries a sustained uplift over Standard plan licensing without commensurate functional value for most users. Without a Premium tier contest, the buyer pays the uplift on every named user.
It ended multi-user (network) licensing and tied every subscription to a named individual. Estates that carried shared licences typically over-bought during the transition; the correction is a reconciliation of named assignments against actual users.
With usage records. Autodesk's own reporting shows per-user activity; inactive assignments are removed before the count is agreed, and the finding is negotiated against the contract rather than accepted as billed.
Usage analytics by product and by user: who runs which application, at what frequency, on which plan. Premium versus standard plan assignment and token-flex alternatives are then sized on the evidence.
Three frameworks: fixed fee for scoped deliverables, contingency tied to verified savings, and an annual retainer for continuous coverage across every vendor. The model is agreed on the first call, which is always complimentary, and independence is warranted in writing on every engagement letter.
Practice across AutoCAD, Revit, Inventor, Fusion, Maya, the AEC and Manufacturing Collections, and Construction Cloud. Independent. Buyer-side only. Engagement structured as fixed fee · contingency · annual retainer.